Las mejores alternativas Microsoft Access Runtime en 2026
¿Buscas alternativas a Microsoft Access Runtime? En esta comparación, analizamos más de cerca Microsoft Access Runtime junto con soluciones de software similares como Microsoft Access Runtime, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU, Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012 y Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB.
Nuestra tabla comparativa detallada destaca las características clave, precios y rendimiento de estas soluciones líderes, para que puedas tomar una decisión informada. Ya sea que busques una funcionalidad sólida, un diseño fácil de usar o alternativas rentables, explora cómo se comparan Microsoft Access Runtime, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU, Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012 y Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB para encontrar el software perfecto para tus objetivos.
Primary Use Case
|
Microsoft Access Runtime
|
Free version for running existing Access applications without design changes. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Small, efficient database engine for mobile and desktop apps with moderate-sized databases. |
|
Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012
|
Provides SQL Server-specific data types support for client applications and development. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Lightweight version of SQL Server for development and testing on local machines. |
Installation & Deployment
|
Microsoft Access Runtime
|
Free download, runtime package, specialized installation software. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Supports Private and Shared Deployment models with minimal administration. |
|
Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012
|
Separate installer with additional dependencies, installs CLR type support. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Lightweight install with smaller footprint than full SQL Server, integrates with Visual Studio. |
Feature Limitations
|
Microsoft Access Runtime
|
No design changes allowed; limited to running applications. Does not support editing database design. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Does not support large scale or heavy workload databases; limited support and advanced features. |
|
Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012
|
No standalone functionality; part of supporting libraries and APIs for development. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Subset of full SQL Server features; supports single-user access; limited high availability features. |
Elegir el software adecuado no se trata solo de funciones. El tamaño, el tipo de licencia, las valoraciones de los usuarios y la popularidad también importan.
Esta comparación rápida muestra cómo se compara Microsoft Access Runtime con Microsoft Access Runtime, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU, Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012 y Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB en estos aspectos clave, para ayudarte a encontrar la mejor alternativa.
Tamaño
|
Microsoft Access Runtime
|
|
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
5,3MB |
|
Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012
|
4,1MB |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
27,8MB |
Licencia
|
Microsoft Access Runtime
|
Freeware |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Comercial |
|
Microsoft System CLR Types for SQL Server 2012
|
Comercial |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Comercial |